Case Proof Workshop

Failed

Prove every claim with page quotes, then sign the memo.

This product didn't ship

Its checks didn't pass, so it was never put live.

See what happened

What you asked for 0 of 12 checked and working

R1: Read an uploaded fictional dispute file and keep it after reload, with parsed parties, claims, and page list. Not checked yet
R2: Draft a numbered proof checklist from the file that the user can approve and edit before proof starts. Not checked yet
R3: Prove each checklist item with exact page quotes showing quote text plus page number, still there after reload. Not checked yet
R4: When an item is stuck with no quote found, mark it stuck and ask the user for specific evidence, then retry with the answer. Not checked yet
R5: File a memo built from the proved items that the user reviews, edits, and signs off, kept after reload. Not checked yet
R6: Show every agent turn live in a streaming turn log with input, reasoning summary, tool call, and result as it happens. Not checked yet
R7: Provide screens for Intake, Checklist Board, Proof Workspace, Evidence Q and A, Memo Sign Off, and Turn Log with clear navigation between them. Not checked yet
R8: Show an empty state before any file exists explaining what fictional file to upload, and an error state when a file is too large or unreadable. Not checked yet
R9: Allow editing and deleting checklist items, evidence answers, and memo drafts, with changes saved after reload. Not checked yet
R10: Follow the meta-models/legal-agent-workshop agent pattern with explicit models steps for parse, checklist, prove, and memo visible in the turn log. Not checked yet
R11: Agent reads the fictional dispute file page by page and keeps page numbers attached to every quote used for proof. Not checked yet
R12: Keep multiple uploaded dispute files in a case list so each case files a memo separately and stays after reload. Not checked yet

What was checked

This version didn't ship, because of a check below.

Not checked

Nothing here should be taken as tested.

Not checked Whether its answers are true
Not checked No build checks are on record for this version
Not checked No model looked at the screenshots of this version
Not checked No Prove it run: nothing it comes with was run for real

The muse

Build a legal case agent like meta-models/legal-agent-workshop. It reads a fictional dispute file, drafts a checklist, proves each item with exact page quotes, asks me for evidence when it is stuck, and files a memo I sign off. Show every turn live.

Took from it

Agent job that reads a dispute, makes a proof checklist, and proves each item
Exact page quote proof pattern with stuck plus ask user flow
Memo filing with sign off step

Left out

Models

Muse WonderRead dispute file, draft checklist, match exact page quotes, ask evidence questions, and draft memo.

Cost per run: $0.27 est.
Runs so far: 0 calls · 0 tokens · $0.00
Build cost: $0.02 est.

Limits

For fictional practice disputes only. Not a lawyer and not legal advice for real cases.
Page quotes come from the uploaded file text. Scanned pages need readable text or proof fails.
When an item cannot be proved from the file, the agent marks it stuck and asks the user instead of guessing.
Memo is a draft until the user signs off in the app. Nothing is filed anywhere else.
All cases, checklists, and memos stay in this browser. They do not follow the user to another device.
One run handles one dispute file up to about 20 pages. Large sets are handled by putting documents in Wonder context, not by embeddings.

How it was built

Muse Code made 18 tool calls and 0 edits across 0 files (+0 −0).
Built in 4 min for about $0.02 in model calls (est.).
An independent check compared your request with the plan: 7 things you asked for. It sent the plan back once.

Open the build room