Made-up shop inbox, decide real (D8)
Muse Glimmer LoRA · Muse Glimmer 30B · finished
The run
- Recipe
- Muse Glimmer LoRA
- Model
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Dataset
- Made-up shop inbox (D8 test)
- GPU
- 1x A100 SXM4 (40 GB)
- GPU time
- 15 min
- GPU cost
- $0.50
- LoRA rank
- 16
- Learning rate
- 0.0002
- Mode
- decide
- Epochs
- 2
- Score only
- 0
Both models were scored on the same held-out test rows by reading how much probability each gave every option's letter. No judge and no model call: the scores are counted, not graded.
Decision results
78 held-out test rows · scored, no judgeAccuracy on 78 held-out rows: tuned 100% (95% to 100%), macro F1 1.00; base 100% (95% to 100%), macro F1 1.00. Scored with no judge. It can be wrong.
Tuned accuracy
100%
78 of 78 · 95% interval 95% to 100%
Base Glimmer accuracy
100%
78 of 78 · 95% interval 95% to 100%
Macro F1
1.00
base 1.00 · each label counts the same
Calibration error
0.0%
0.0% before T = 0.25
The tuned model was right on 78 of 78 held-out examples (100%); base Glimmer was right on 78 (100%).
T = 0.25 was fit on 38 dev rows to bring confidence closer to how often the model was right on them. On the held-out test rows the calibration error is 0.0% with T (0.0% before).
- The tuned model is a small LoRA adapter on Muse Glimmer 30B, trained on 274 of this dataset's examples. The test rows were held out before training, and both models were scored on the same ones.
- It can be wrong: check anything that matters.
Per label
Tuned · base Glimmer| Label | Test rows | Precision | Recall | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing | 20 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 |
| Shipping | 20 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 |
| Returns | 20 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 |
| Account | 18 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 | 1.00 · 1.00 |
Confusion matrix
Tuned: rows are the right label, columns the pick| Right label | Billing | Shipping | Returns | Account | None |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shipping | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Returns | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Account | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 |
Base Glimmer's matrix
| Right label | Billing | Shipping | Returns | Account | None |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shipping | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Returns | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Account | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 |
Reliability
After T, on the test rows- Tuned (T = 0.25)
- Base Glimmer (T = 0.25)
- Right as often as it says
Each dot is the test rows whose confidence fell in one tenth of the range: across, how sure the model said it was; up, how often it was right. On the dashed line it is right as often as it says. Calibration error tuned 0.0% with T, 0.0% before; base Glimmer 0.0% with T, 4.5% before.
The bins as a table
| Confidence | Tuned: rows, right, mean confidence | Base Glimmer: rows, right, mean confidence |
|---|---|---|
| 0% to 10% | none | none |
| 10% to 20% | none | none |
| 20% to 30% | none | none |
| 30% to 40% | none | none |
| 40% to 50% | none | none |
| 50% to 60% | none | none |
| 60% to 70% | none | none |
| 70% to 80% | none | none |
| 80% to 90% | none | none |
| 90% to 100% | 78, 100%, 100% | 78, 100%, 100% |
Baselines
All on the same test rows| Approach | Right | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| Tunedthe trained adapter | 78 of 78 | 100%95% to 100% |
| Base Glimmerzero-shot, same prompts | 78 of 78 | 100%95% to 100% |
| Always Returnsthe commonest training label | 20 of 78 | 26%17% to 36% |
| Word overlapa stand-in, not a model: the label sharing most words | 61 of 78 | 78%68% to 86% |
Health
- Letter mass, median and lowest
- tuned 1.00, 1.00 · base Glimmer 0.90, 0.82
- Answered "none of the listed options"
- tuned 0% · base Glimmer 0%
- Decline check (right label taken out)
- tuned 78 of 78 (100%) · base Glimmer 72 of 78 (92%)
- Renderings too long to score
- 0
- Test rows with no usable score
- 0 of 78
- Prompts per row
- 1
Letter mass is the share of the first answer token's probability that lands on the shown letters; near 1 the model answers in the format. Base Glimmer sometimes starts with a word instead of a letter, so its letter mass is lower and this first-token read understates what a prompted base model could do.