Muse MuseConcept

Independent concept built on Meta's Model API. Not an official Meta product.

Made-up shop inbox, decide score (D8)

Muse Glimmer LoRA · Muse Glimmer 30B · finished

The run

Recipe
Muse Glimmer LoRA
Model
Muse Glimmer 30B
GPU
1x A100 SXM4 (40 GB)
GPU time
9 min
GPU cost
$0.30
LoRA rank
16
Learning rate
0.0002
Mode
decide
Epochs
2
Score only
1

Both models were scored on the same held-out test rows by reading how much probability each gave every option's letter. No judge and no model call: the scores are counted, not graded.

Decision results

78 held-out test rows · scored, no judge

Accuracy on 78 held-out rows: base 100% (95% to 100%), macro F1 1.00. Scored with no judge. It can be wrong.

Base Glimmer accuracy

100%

78 of 78 · 95% interval 95% to 100%

Macro F1

1.00

each label counts the same

Calibration error

0.0%

4.4% before T = 0.25

Base Glimmer was right on 78 of 78 held-out examples (100%), with nothing trained.

T = 0.25 was fit on 38 dev rows to bring confidence closer to how often the model was right on them. On the held-out test rows the calibration error is 0.0% with T (4.4% before).

  • It can be wrong: check anything that matters.

Per label

Base Glimmer
Precision, recall and F1 for each label on the test rows
LabelTest rowsPrecisionRecallF1
Billing201.001.001.00
Shipping201.001.001.00
Returns201.001.001.00
Account181.001.001.00

Confusion matrix

Base Glimmer: rows are the right label, columns the pick
Base Glimmer's picks on the test rows: each row is the right label, each column what it picked
Right labelBillingShippingReturnsAccountNone
Billing200000
Shipping020000
Returns002000
Account000180

Reliability

After T, on the test rows
  • Base Glimmer (T = 0.25)
  • Right as often as it says
0%0%50%50%100%100%ConfidenceShare rightBase Glimmer: 78 rows at 90% to 100% confidence (mean 100%), 100% right

Each dot is the test rows whose confidence fell in one tenth of the range: across, how sure the model said it was; up, how often it was right. On the dashed line it is right as often as it says. Calibration error base Glimmer 0.0% with T, 4.4% before.

The bins as a table
Reliability bins after T
ConfidenceBase Glimmer: rows, right, mean confidence
0% to 10%none
10% to 20%none
20% to 30%none
30% to 40%none
40% to 50%none
50% to 60%none
60% to 70%none
70% to 80%none
80% to 90%none
90% to 100%78, 100%, 100%

Baselines

All on the same test rows
Accuracy of each model and baseline on the same test rows
ApproachRightAccuracy
Base Glimmerzero-shot, same prompts78 of 78100%95% to 100%
Always Returnsthe commonest training label20 of 7826%17% to 36%
Word overlapa stand-in, not a model: the label sharing most words61 of 7878%68% to 86%

Health

Letter mass, median and lowest
base Glimmer 0.90, 0.82
Answered "none of the listed options"
base Glimmer 0%
Decline check (right label taken out)
base Glimmer 72 of 78 (92%)
Renderings too long to score
0
Test rows with no usable score
0 of 78
Prompts per row
1

Letter mass is the share of the first answer token's probability that lands on the shown letters; near 1 the model answers in the format. Base Glimmer sometimes starts with a word instead of a letter, so its letter mass is lower and this first-token read understates what a prompted base model could do.